By John Lawrence
OPINION: Halfway through Reconciliation Week, and two days after the fifth anniversary of George Floyd’s death, Kumanjayi White, a 24-year-old, mentally disabled Warlpiri man from Yuendumu with “special needs”, died following his forceful arrest and restraint by two off-duty NT Police Officers inside Coles Supermarket, Alice Springs.
One of those policemen was Police Prosecutor and long-term officer Steven Haig, who had only four months before received complaints about his forceful arrest of a young Indigenous woman, remarkably at the same supermarket. There has even been published a photograph of Sergeant Haig in the process of “arresting” the Indigenous woman, which shows him with his right leg and knee over the neck area of his arrestee. Further, he has apparently been the subject of previous complaints concerning “use of force” and other matters.
This latest death occurred two weeks before the publication date of the NT Coroner’s Findings in the gargantuan Coronial Inquest into the death of 19-year-old Warlpiri man, Kumanjayi Walker, who was shot dead while being arrested by Northern Territory Police in Yuendumu on the 9th of November 2019. In acceptance of the families’ request, in view of the latest tragedy, the Coroner has announced that her Findings will now be published on July 7, “either in Yuendumu or Alice Springs, depending on the views of the community.” A reasonable and appropriate decision one would think.
As the investigation begins, and before the Coronial Inquest occurs, the immediate family and Warlpiri community have requested an independent Investigation, one with no connections to the NTPF, to conduct what will be an important and complex investigation.
Their request has, to a degree, been supported by the Federal Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, NT Senator Malarndirri McCarthy. Academics, Professor Thalia Anthony, other Aboriginal spokespersons and other Human Rights bodies have also supported the request. However, the request has been rejected by Acting Police Commissioner Martin Dole who has been supported by NT Chief Minister Finocchiaro who stated; “we also stand in solidarity with our police and the security personnel involved in this incident and incidents right across the NT.”
In the circumstances, one can well understand why the Warlpiri community and the NT Indigenous people generally have little, if any, trust in the NTPF conducting a “transparent” and “objective” investigation into Kumanjayi White’s cause and manner of death. This is based on the troubled history of Police relations with Indigenous people including their investigatory work relating to Indigenous people dying in custody and in suspicious circumstances.
The actions of these two NT police officers could be criminal and could lead to them being charged with criminal offences. At this stage we just don’t know.
That will hinge on what the evidence gathered establishes as to the actions of the deceased, the actions of the security officers, the police officers’ actions and the Pathologist’s opinion as to the deceased’s cause of death. It will also depend on what the body worn footage from the security officers reveals, eyewitness accounts, the total forensic evidence plus determining the level of force applied and the relevant times in play, which will then reveal the cause and manner of death and what, if any, criminal responsibility flows.
The gathering of that evidence clearly needs to be done by independent Investigators who have no perceivable or actual bias towards the NT Police Force.
Experienced, highly qualified professional investigators with no connection to the NTPF are absolutely essential here if justice, the ultimate aim, is ever to be achieved. There is simply no way in 2025 that this can be achieved by any branch of the NTPF. The trust required for that to occur no longer exists. It is long gone.
History, plus the NTPF actions to date since Kumunjayi White’s death render them now inappropriate to conduct the investigation. This is an important threshold question, politically and legally. It is a fundamental issue of conflict which cannot be simply brushed aside by Dole’s “rejection” and his spurious reasons for the same.
If the NTPF do the investigation, it will poison, at least in perception, the resultant Coronial Inquiry. In my opinion, any Coronial Inquiry will be of limited worth if the evidence that it’s to rely on is gathered by the NTPF.
Historical Reasons
The history of many NT police investigations into cases involving “suspicious” Indigenous deaths and deaths in custody reveal inadequate and incompetent police work. Of course most of those cases now lie in the graveyard of history buried and forgotten. But not by the Indigenous families and communities concerned.
To name a couple (and there are many more) there was the “inept” distressful and disgraceful NT Police Investigation into the 8-year-old Indigenous boy K.R. who, in 2007, was found drowned in a waterhole just outside Borroloola where he lived. Initially the police concluded it was an accident. This was despite the fact his pockets had been filled with plate-sized rocks, he had abrasions on the top and back of his head and there were tracks of K and an adult leading to the waterhole. Not to mention K’s notorious shyness towards water.
Based on the Police concluding it was an accident there was no criminal investigation just a Coronial File to compile which took over three years to complete. That’s how that was done by the NTPF and of course that case is now forgotten by most of the NT community because that is how it works. But not for the boy’s family and the Aboriginal Community of Borroloola. They believed from the very beginning and based on the evidence outlined above that the boy was murdered.
Similarly, and there really are many more, the NTPF investigation into the death of 25-year-old Indigenous woman Sasha Green who died in Tennant Creek in 2013 from a knife wound to her femoral artery. The death was in all likelihood a homicide committed by her then partner during a drunken argument. The police after a woeful investigation concluded, despite there being no history of self-harm, that it was suicide.
The Inquest was eventually held in Tennant Creek in 2017-18, four years after the actual death. The Coroner, Mr Cavenagh, was blistering in his criticisms of the “investigation”. He found it to be “botched”, “incompetent” and one that took an “inordinate amount of time”.
Sasha’s parents were devastated by the lack of interest and effort put into the killing of their daughter. Ultimately they received the usual “condolences” and “apology” from, then Assistant Commissioner Michael Murphy, who was summonsed by the Coroner to the Tenant Creek Coronial Court to try and explain away, without success, the gross incompetence of the Northern Territory police investigation.
NTPF Actions so far
The NT Police Force’s conduct in regards to updating the public on the death has already strongly suggested actual as well as perceived bias in their approach. The major face and voice of the NTPF’s endeavour so far has been Assistant Commissioner Travis Wurst. He has appeared with updates at media pressers informing the media and the nation about the event based on what he apparently knows.
He has also assured everyone, including the deceased’s family, the NT Indigenous community and the rest of the country that the police are investigating this death with an “objective lens”. The problem is Assistant Commissioner Wurst has been very selective in his words outlining his updates. So selective that he has given any fair-minded person watching this a reasonable view that he is biased in favour of his fellow NT Police officers.
Immediately following the event which was at lunchtime on May 27, 2025 the media had picked up eyewitness accounts to this incident. In one ABC report it was described thus by an eye witness; “they saw a big white man grabbing an Aboriginal man in some sort of hold. I’m not sure what it was, like I can’t be sure, but it looked pretty violent and then they slammed him to the ground”. Other eyewitnesses have described to the public via the media that some shoppers heard the police officers involved say; “stop resisting”. Also, that some customers yelled at the policemen to stop. They say that they heard the deceased yelling out; “Mama! Mama!”.
Assistant Commissioner Wurst tells the media that “his thoughts are with the family” and he “offers them his condolences”. His account, as to what happened, was necessarily selective.
But not neutral. He chose to tell the media that the deceased “assaulted the security officer”; the off-duty police officers intervened, and the deceased was “taken to ground”. He also then chose to tell the media that shortly before the “supermarket incident” there was another “incident” in the street outside the Commonwealth Bank in which the deceased was seen to hit a woman on the back.
He then asked for witnesses to that event to come forward and assist the police. What he chose to not tell the media was the narrative that the above eyewitnesses had described or what he undoubtedly knew about Sergeant Haig and the “other incident” of forceful arrest involving him and an Indigenous female four months previously in the same supermarket.
On that alone I’m sure the family are offended, hurt and angry that at such a distressing time the NT Police Force are giving out information which horribly besmirches their deceased son. In the same update he then tells us he will oversee this police investigation and coordinate the same with the Professional Integrity Unit. Whatever that means.
From my experience this so classically describes yet another day in the life of an NT Indigenous person. Promises, assurances, condolences, undertakings which are all, by virtue of previous failures, worthless and now a biased version of the tragedy from the senior police officer who is actually going to head up this investigation.
Conclusion
In my view from experience, the NT Police decision to insist on investigating this matter couldn’t be more inappropriate. No doubt it will now rely on the majority of people forgetting the relevant history and elected politicians addressing this tragedy based on their own political imperatives.
The NTPF decision to reject the family and communities’ request is hard-headed and unjustified. The reasons given on June 2, by Commissioner Dole as to forensic compromises are spurious. This attitude, needless to say supported by the NT CLP Government, compounds the atrocious relations between the NTPF, the Government and the Territory Indigenous Community.
It confirms and compounds their distrust. If they persist in being hard-headed about this, the Federal Government could order the NT Police Force to step aside and allow a unit of qualified experienced and independent investigators from the Victorian Police to take over the commenced Investigation to its completion. This will satisfy all citizens that the matter will be properly and objectively investigated thus allowing the proper decisions to be made based on that evidence which should achieve justice from this tragic situation.
John Lawrence first started in the Territory in 1987 as a Crown Prosecutor, five years later becoming the Solicitor in Charge of NAALAS, now NAAJA. He later joined the Independent Bar where he has remained for 28 years. He was appointed Senior Counsel in 2010 and has featured in many high-profile cases, including several Royal Commissions of Inquiry. He has served as President of the NT Bar Association as well as the Criminal Lawyer’s Association NT (CLANT) and as a Director of the Law Council of Australia.
John has written numerous articles for various national publications over the years, mostly on justice issues. He has been a passionate advocate for human rights, the rule of law and the rights of all Territorians having spent a large part of his career representing Indigenous people and organisations in their struggle against disadvantage and injustice.
His regualr column for the NT Independent is called Se Acabo. John has witnessed how the NT has developed over the last 38 years and pulls no punches in his assessment of our current problems.





Does anybody take any notice of this bloke?.
I have known John Lawrence personally for many years. In my opinion, he is a peanut. He has jumped forward many times to prosecute Police Officers on trial for alleged crimes. In my conversations with him, and my observations of his practice and written articles he has authored, my opinion of him has been shaped to believe he is anti-police.
Having observed him in court many times, my opinion is that if I needed a lawyer to represent me in the NT, he would be at the bottom of my list. I recall in one case he was prosecuting against a Police Officer, where he stood at the Bar Table with two paralegals assisting him, he raised some case law to the presiding Judge. But Defence Lawyer raised to his feet with an objection, and without any paralegals assisting him, and cited a latter case that superseded the one raised by Lawrence.
Regarding an independent investigation, This has in the past to be shown as a grave error. The NT is unique, and an interstate investigator will arrive without the vast amount of knowledge required to investigate a matter that is challenged by local culture and accepted practices. Only NT police can be qualified to investigate NT matters.
The case Mr Lawrence refers to where the Coroner said it to be “botched”, “incompetent” and one that took an “inordinate amount of time”…. The error here was having a relatively junior police officer investigating what could be considered potentially as a complex investigation. This could be considered an error of middle management failing in not referring the investigation to a more qualified investigator. What Mr Lawrence has failed to recognise is that he is citing a very old matter, and as a result of the findings, NTPOL installed a larger dedicated Coronial investigations unit.
To suggest the NT police are not qualified to investigate NT deaths in police custody, is to also say that NT Police are not qualified to investigate any death.
The NT Public can be proud of it’s Police Force, although the upper management remains a serious concern. John Lawrence is qualified to comment on this death, as much as Martin Dole is qualified to be Acting Commissioner of Police… Or in other words, both are proving to be severely lacking in my opinion.
To watch Peter Elliot face off against John Lawrence is priceless. Lawrence needs paralegals assistance while Peter Elliot runs rings around him on his own…. Maybe another story, John Lawrence is not so squeaky clean…. those within the ‘circle’ know his history.
@Lawdog: It’s uncontroversial for reasonable people to form the opinion that any organisation investigating itself, is not going to have the requisite objectivity to do so. There are thousands of examples of this the world over, where it goes the way the same organisation wants it to go, often without any outside scrutiny.
We have just witnessed CLP ministers in the Public Accounts Committee hearing ‘investigating’ and we use the term verrrrrry loosely, CLP connected senior public servants and the husband of the current CLP Chief Minister. They, unsurprisingly, rejected calls for an independent/external investigation then cut the 2 hour hearing short by 45 minutes and published their findings about an hour later.
NTPS may be qualified, in the sense of procedural qualifications, to investigate but that doesn’t mean it passes the smell test.
And being challenged with a legal authority from the other side that beats the one you have happens all the time in courtrooms around the country and the world. Not even a QC/KC is immune to that happening to them. No big deal, that’s legal jousting for you! Doesn’t make you a bad lawyer just because someone else found an authority which was liked better by a particular judge on a particular day.
The NT Ombudsman has legal authority to oversee any police investigation. There is the independent oversight.
Your quote “And being challenged with a legal authority from the other side that beats the one you have happens all the time in courtrooms around the country and the world. Not even a QC/KC is immune to that happening to them. No big deal, that’s legal jousting for you! Doesn’t make you a bad lawyer “” ….. This is not so…. Case law is established when a single Judge sitting in the Supreme Court makes a ruling. This is superseded by a full panel of Judges sitting in the Supreme Court. This is superseded by a ruling from a Judge in the High Court. To say “… an authority which was liked better by a particular judge on a particular day”… is completely false. Has nothing to do with a particular Judge on a particular day. That Judge in the lower court or the supreme court must comply with the ruling. There is no choice in the matter. If a lower Judge went against the ruling, the case would be successfully appealed.
The NT Ombudsman, the final bastion of objectivity and independence in the NT. ROTFLMAO
We get it, you don’t like John Lawrence for whatever reason.
Just for a change, try and comment more on the content of his article, not the man himself.
And your Pyramid Of Authority argument makes no mention of ‘whatever highest courts in whatever land’s’ rulings being challenged and changed all the time – see Roe v Wade in the USA for one of the most well known ones.
Courts don’t always agree with previous rulings/authorities, or even their own sometimes, their weight can change depending on the viewpoint of the sitting judge/s at that time.
Let me put it this way: 2 opposing parties in a legal case, each with their own list of authorities, from different Supreme Courts around Australia. None from the High Court. The presiding Judge or Judges consider the merits of the arguments supported by differing authorities and then make a decision. One compelling argument with authorities beats the other, on that particular day.
You could easily have the exact same set up, same facts, same lawyers, same authorities, except change the judiciary, and get the opposite outcome.
The idea of ‘compelling arguments’ changes all the time. Otherwise, there would be a Universal Golden List Of Authority Plus Argument that could never be challenged ever and legal cases would last 15 minutes, won by simply pointing at the highest case in the UGLOAPA that suits your particular position.
Thankfully this is not how law works all the time.
Top Tip: remember to play the ball not the man. 😉
You obviously have no idea about the application of law in Australia…. You say ” see Roe v Wade in the USA “…. Ummm, that is USA… Australia operates under the Westminster system of Government and justice… USA does not. Australia takes into account court rulings from historical court rulings of Great Britain, including the Scottish High Court…. USA does not. You are perhaps what some would call an armchair lawyer who has not ever worked in the application of law, where as I have… So I will ignore your two cents worth in a debate on legal practice that you are not qualified to comment on.
I just hope the assaulted Coles Security Guard (reported by media), the assaulted baby-holding-lady from the bank (reported by media) and the 2 people who where assaulted in 2024 and 2025 can participate in any investigation.