By Steven Turton
Australia’s worrying future under climate change was laid bare last week when the first National Climate Risk Assessment was released. It revealed extreme heat, fires, floods, droughts and coastal inundation already threatens lives and livelihoods – and will wreak further havoc in coming decades.
Much media attention focused on the effects in the continent’s south, where most Australians live. But the assessment found Northern Australia will be hardest hit on many fronts, including extreme heat.
This has major implications. Big plans are afoot to turn Northern Australia into Asia’s “food bowl”, as part of broader development for the region. It would involve building large-scale irrigation, dam and water infrastructure to increase agricultural production, create jobs and boost local economies.
But any discussion about transforming Northern Australia must confront the climate hazards threatening the region’s prosperity.
What is the ‘food bowl’ idea?
Northern Australia comprises roughly 53 per cent of Australia’s land mass.
Turning the region into a food bowl would involve irrigating savannas and other ecosystems across northern parts of Western Australia, the Northern Territory and Queensland. The concept dates back decades, but gained momentum in 2015 when the Abbott government released a national white paper on developing Northern Australia.
Efforts to bring the plan to fruition are continuing. In 2018 for example, CSIRO released analysis of Northern Australia’s water resources and agricultural potential. And last year, a business case was developed for a major irrigation area in Far North Queensland.
The vision has been criticised due to concerns about river ecosystems, economic feasibility and Indigenous rights.
A decade ago, I challenged the Northern Australia development agenda from a climate change perspective. While proponents pointed to a bright future for the north – with new roads, rail, dams and food production – I argued climate change may eventually make large parts of the region unlivable.
Since then, changes in climate across the north have confirmed many concerns I described.
More frequent and intense extreme weather poses the biggest climate risk for the region. Northern Australia is largely tropical and subtropical, so global heating effects will be more pronounced. This will force natural, social and economic systems into uncharted climate territory.
Research already shows people, food production and nature will be vulnerable to higher-intensity cyclones, more intense heatwaves, floods, droughts, bushfires and other climate harms.
The new climate risk report paints an even more dire future for the region.
Danger in store for the north
As the risk assessment made clear, the world is on track to heat by at least 2.7°C by the 2090s if we don’t change course. In light of this, the report says:
Northern Australia is likely to experience escalating challenges as its proneness to hazards increases as global temperature rise. This will put pressure on health, critical infrastructure, natural species and ecosystems, and primary industries. It will also pose additional challenges to emergency responders.
Extreme weather events, including heatwaves, bushfires, flooding and tropical cyclones, will intensify safety and security risks, potentially resulting in loss of life, destabilisation of community structures, and increased migration away from high-risk areas.
The number of heatwave days is projected to increase across Australia – but particularly in the north.
Global heating is already affecting the production of some tropical tree crops, including mangoes and avocados. These crops need periods of cooler winter weather to flower and bear good fruit.
Livestock grazing is the economic lifeblood for many communities in the north’s tropical savannas. The risk assessment notes changes in temperature and water can worsen pasture for livestock. Increasing thermal stress in northern cattle herds is also a significant threat.
The risk assessment also raises concerns about other primary industries, many of which exist in the north. Changes in practices may buy more time. Much will depend on future carbon emissions.
Supply chains – such as storage, transport and distribution – are crucial for getting agricultural produce to consumers. Extreme weather, such as Cyclone Jasper in 2023, is already disrupting supply chains in the north. This will only worsen.
And an agriculture industry needs people. But the risk assessment says without action, some areas of the north may become unliveable and uninsurable. Floods, tropical cyclones and bushfires can leave communities isolated, and these and other hazards pose serious health risks.

Australian Climate Service, CC BY-SA
What must happen now
Northern Australia has much to lose if carbon emissions keep rising and global heating continues. Adaptation and innovation may allow human communities and industries to survive for a while. But at some stage, crucial tipping points will be breached.
This will degrade the natural assets underpinning the north’s food, fibre and tourism industries.
Australia, like the rest of the world, must continue the journey to net zero carbon emissions by 2050. This includes meeting Australia’s new pledge to reduce emissions by 62–70 per cent below 2005 levels by 2035.
Unless global warming is dramatically curbed, Northern Australia is unlikely to prosper in the second half of this century – and grandiose plans to turn the region into a food bowl will turn to dust.
Steve Turton, is Adjunct Professor of Environmental Geography, CQUniversity Australia. He has received funding from the Australian Government.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.




Climate “Threat”. Not “Change”. Acceptance of a reality. When and where we start?
More conjecture based on scenarios that are dreamt up then modelled. The climate report was based on what ifs that were then modelled. The reality is that cyclones have been decreasing in frequency and last year was the poorest wet season that I recall in the last 50 years. It’s always been hot up here, so what’s that got to do with anything. I grew pumpkins and pawpaw in 43 degree weather when I did a short stint in Katherine. As a teenager I grew tomatoes in the garden in Adelaide during the hottest part of summer.
How often do these report authors get outside of their climate controlled environment?
Do they realise that the greatest source of atmospheric carbon in the north is from savannah fires that have been happening long before modern civilization.?
If there is one thing that comes out of such dramatised reports it is that we need to build better roads and housing and take other measures to mitigate the effects of droughts,floods and severe weather events.
Not one of the predictions by the climate doomists has ever come true. Not one.
CO2 is not the driving factor, it’s the sun. It’s always been the sun.
One should look at the recent unexpected relatively high sunspot activity. Every single model expected that the activity of cycle 25 would be lower than that of cycle 24, except for one model. That one model was by Prof. Valentina Zharkova. She has modelled solar activity and her solar dynamo model is able to accurately hindcast all major climate events of the past many hundreds of years.
Her modelling suggests we are coming to the end of the active phase of the sun and we are entering a new Grand Solar Minimum, possibly even a Super Grand Solar Minimum. The coming cold is what we should be concerned about, not the made up fears around CO2.
Given she developed the only model to successfully predict solar cycle 25, it would be a good idea to listen to her views, rather than listen to so called scientists who have never been right in their predictions about the climate.
Everything the scientists have predicted has come true.
The proof is here for all to see. The CSIRO State of the Climate has been doing a report with predictions for decades now.
Increased fires, increased floods, less cyclones but when they do arrive they are bigger. Increased droughts. They have all been predicted and quantified by some of Australia’s brightest minds.
What kind of science qualifications do you hold?
https://www.csiro.au/en/research/environmental-impacts/climate-change/State-of-the-Climate
Have no desire to challenge either Phil or Spiggot. We all have our views. My view is to take note of all. Climate has changed and therefore exists possibility / probability that Climate can, will, continue to change? The primary question therefore: Why – When – And How?
Sea levels are and will continue to rise. Due to water temperature. Our Australian coastline. Particularly, the East coast; but also southern West coast. Open to low level inundation. Evidence? Queensland – Northern NSW coastal infrastructure?
An early-on Govt Climate Report projected that eighty-five percent of all national infra-structure is located within fifty kilometres of oceanic boundaries ie therefore subject to inundation. Evidence . . . Northern NSW.
Serious Alarm began in 2007: “Risks to Australian Coast”. – A first past National Assessment. Followed up 2008 / 2009 _ 2010 / 2011. Adaption in Coastal Australia. Report Number 4. November 2011. Also, many Wagait Community people will remember our Local Govt and Wagait resident(s) interest in an excellent 2010 local Govt Report? That disappeared, and re-appeared . . . and disappeared a few short years ago? A 2010 Report that was written specifically, for Wagait Community.