How dare you insult the hard working men and women (and ‘other’) of the renound NT Public Service. They are in there day in and day out, doing overtime, going above and beyond the call of duty, providing exceptional service daily, with no complaint or fear or favour. They really…oh its 421pm gotta go….
The angel on Jim Jefferies' left shoulderon September 24, 2025 at 6:07 pm
Still silent on your ‘tough on crime but only for some’ we see Spiggot. Good work!
Ol’ mate was speeding and during daylight hours and most likely by his own words, intoxicated for the record.
Apology accepted.
The same as Professor Boofby. He’ll be back commenting soon hoping we’ve all forgotten his same silence and tacit support too.
… MLAs are public servants. Supposedly.
The Crappy Littleminded Party gave their best public servant friend Greg Shamahan $500,000 a year to sit in ICAC, hoover up all the whistleblower information and identities, do nothing, then piss off back to whatever highly paid NT job he has now, knowing all that information for future reference.
If the Public Service is underperforming it’s because it’s being run by cowboys and charlatans and bullies.
You are entitled to your racist views, but for us normal people we judge a crime on the criminal actions, not the words that someone says after the fact.
The angel on Jim Jefferies' left shoulderon September 25, 2025 at 5:33 pm
It’s OK Spiggot, we can multi-task-thread. Try to keep up.
Please enlighten everyone and especially us on how our views are “racist”; against which particular racial group are you talking about? Caucasians perhaps? We’re confused by your label.
… Loving the second ad hominem attack too – “us normal people”. We award you 2 gold stars, one for each.
Let’s run with your logic then:
to “judge a crime on the criminal actions”
Jake Danby killed one person and hospitalised another, using his car as the weapon.
If he meant it, then that’s murder.
If it was an accident but he was reckless and/or negligent (and under the influence of alcohol by his own words) then that’s manslaughter.
Both carry hefty prison sentences, on paper at least.
We absolutely judge him on his first crime and already have: killing one person and hospitalising another, using his car, most likely while drunk, definitely while speeding.
But that doesn’t stop us also judging him on his sick and pathetic racial vilification and celebration after running over 2 human beings.
We also know you think that’s fine to say all those things, as you have not mentioned any of it even once; only to attempt to excuse it away. You stand on the side of Jake Danby and anyone who shares those views. We get it. That’s completely up to you and thank you for doing so semi-in public.
Unfortunately you’re not the only one in the NT or the country who has opinions like Jake Danby and wants to try to normalise them.
… We also note you have not condemned his killing of an Aboriginal man and the wounding of another.
We can see how you frame these things by the way you try to assist the lovely Mr Danby in getting out of his responsibility for other human beings – about which you were factually wrong and continue to ignore this – and how you refuse to criticise his choice of language and his attitude to people he obviously feels are below him for whatever reason.
… And it’s no surprise to our household that this Crappy Littleminded Party has watered down the Anti-Discrimination Act so people like Jake Danby escape consequences for such vomit-inducing words.
Interesting to note that Marie-Clare Boothby as Attorney Generally Rubbish said on the ABC:
“[She] removed the vilification provision introduced by Labor that prohibits speech that could offend.”
“We believe Territorians should not have their speech policed or be attacked for telling a joke by a bureaucratic agency.”
The man in charge of that agency, NT Anti-Discrimination Commissioner Jeswynn Yogaratnam, strongly rebuked the new CLP government for pursuing the changes.
We wonder if the Attorney Generally Rubbish knew of her family member Jake Danby’s words and texts at the time and that’s what drove the change in legislation?
… There’s a WOW moment right there, if correct:
CLP Government knowingly changing legislation to protect their own repugnant and racist family members!
I note in relation to the proposed enterprise agreement now voted down that redundancy and redeployment changes for Administrative, Technical, Professional & Physical stream NT public service employees who currently have a two years employment job security clause in their current enterprise agreement, that in the new enterprise agreement “a worker would be offered six months notice, or if aged over 45 or with 20 years public service experience, offered 12 months notice.”
I note with interest in the NT Office of the Commissioner for Public Employment information sheet available on the NT government website on page 9 in relation to redeployment and redundancy it states –
that they may continue to work through the redundancy notice period which may be up to 52 weeks.
I note with interest that the words “may” are stated and not the words “will” .
Based on performance, I’d offer the public service a negative 20% pay rise.
Entirely overpaid and way too many of them.
How dare you insult the hard working men and women (and ‘other’) of the renound NT Public Service.
They are in there day in and day out, doing overtime, going above and beyond the call of duty, providing exceptional service daily, with no complaint or fear or favour.
They really…oh its 421pm gotta go….
Still silent on your ‘tough on crime but only for some’ we see Spiggot. Good work!
Ol’ mate was speeding and during daylight hours and most likely by his own words, intoxicated for the record.
Apology accepted.
The same as Professor Boofby. He’ll be back commenting soon hoping we’ve all forgotten his same silence and tacit support too.
…
MLAs are public servants. Supposedly.
The Crappy Littleminded Party gave their best public servant friend Greg Shamahan $500,000 a year to sit in ICAC, hoover up all the whistleblower information and identities, do nothing, then piss off back to whatever highly paid NT job he has now, knowing all that information for future reference.
If the Public Service is underperforming it’s because it’s being run by cowboys and charlatans and bullies.
Same for the Government.
Industrial Cleaners For Better time. 🙂
Wrong thread.
You are entitled to your racist views, but for us normal people we judge a crime on the criminal actions, not the words that someone says after the fact.
It’s OK Spiggot, we can multi-task-thread. Try to keep up.
Please enlighten everyone and especially us on how our views are “racist”; against which particular racial group are you talking about? Caucasians perhaps? We’re confused by your label.
…
Loving the second ad hominem attack too – “us normal people”. We award you 2 gold stars, one for each.
Let’s run with your logic then:
to “judge a crime on the criminal actions”
Jake Danby killed one person and hospitalised another, using his car as the weapon.
If he meant it, then that’s murder.
If it was an accident but he was reckless and/or negligent (and under the influence of alcohol by his own words) then that’s manslaughter.
Both carry hefty prison sentences, on paper at least.
We absolutely judge him on his first crime and already have: killing one person and hospitalising another, using his car, most likely while drunk, definitely while speeding.
But that doesn’t stop us also judging him on his sick and pathetic racial vilification and celebration after running over 2 human beings.
We also know you think that’s fine to say all those things, as you have not mentioned any of it even once; only to attempt to excuse it away. You stand on the side of Jake Danby and anyone who shares those views. We get it. That’s completely up to you and thank you for doing so semi-in public.
Unfortunately you’re not the only one in the NT or the country who has opinions like Jake Danby and wants to try to normalise them.
…
We also note you have not condemned his killing of an Aboriginal man and the wounding of another.
We can see how you frame these things by the way you try to assist the lovely Mr Danby in getting out of his responsibility for other human beings – about which you were factually wrong and continue to ignore this – and how you refuse to criticise his choice of language and his attitude to people he obviously feels are below him for whatever reason.
…
And it’s no surprise to our household that this Crappy Littleminded Party has watered down the Anti-Discrimination Act so people like Jake Danby escape consequences for such vomit-inducing words.
Interesting to note that Marie-Clare Boothby as Attorney Generally Rubbish said on the ABC:
“[She] removed the vilification provision introduced by Labor that prohibits speech that could offend.”
“We believe Territorians should not have their speech policed or be attacked for telling a joke by a bureaucratic agency.”
The man in charge of that agency, NT Anti-Discrimination Commissioner Jeswynn Yogaratnam, strongly rebuked the new CLP government for pursuing the changes.
We wonder if the Attorney Generally Rubbish knew of her family member Jake Danby’s words and texts at the time and that’s what drove the change in legislation?
…
There’s a WOW moment right there, if correct:
CLP Government knowingly changing legislation to protect their own repugnant and racist family members!
I note in relation to the proposed enterprise agreement now voted down that redundancy and redeployment changes for Administrative, Technical, Professional & Physical stream NT public service employees who currently have a two years employment job security clause in their current enterprise agreement, that in the new enterprise agreement “a worker would be offered six months notice, or if aged over 45 or with 20 years public service experience, offered 12 months notice.”
I note with interest in the NT Office of the Commissioner for Public Employment information sheet available on the NT government website on page 9 in relation to redeployment and redundancy it states –
that they may continue to work through the redundancy notice period which may be up to 52 weeks.
I note with interest that the words “may” are stated and not the words “will” .
https://ocpe.nt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/1550075/information-sheet-general-ntps-enterprise-agreement-july-2025.pdf
32. Redeployment and Redundancy
…………….that they may continue to work through the redundancy notice period which may be up to 52 weeks.