Recently the ABC reported on a Senate committee established by the Greens which focused on human reproductive issues including from their perspective making abortions more accessible and affordable.

I have always been amazed at the Greens approach to abortion.

Here is a party which supports the rights of Aboriginal people, rainbow people, women, minority groups and refugees – all humans.

They are vocal on animal rights, climate change and the Voice.

But when it comes to protecting humans not born, they turn their back and show no support.

So why this attitude? They don’t say.

Don’t they believe that the unborn are human beings? They certainly are not a different species?

Can they explain why a baby born at 27 weeks is protected by the law but if aborted at the same number of weeks is not.

It seems that this is discrimination against one group of humans, or do the Human Rights Commission and Greens support discrimination against the most vulnerable and defenseless members of the human family?

If only the unborn could speak!

Do the Human Rights Commission and Greens support the rights of the fathers, after all they are, biologically, the other half of the new human individual?

The unborn human (baby) is nurtured and protected in the mother’s womb but is not part of the women.

Do the Greens support the right of doctors to have a conscientious objection against performing or giving advice on abortions?

In the NT a doctor can be deregistered if they don’t give advice. Freedom denied.

There have always been mothers who don’t want their babies for many reasons. So why don’t the Greens support them by promoting the natural, loving and life giving option of adoption to give the unborn the same chance that we have – to live a whole life.

Why don’t they make adoption more accessible and affordable?

Abortion is a stain on our Australian society. What we need is love, compassion and a Voice that protects the unborn in our Constitution.